Then we published the answer — including the part that doesn't flatter astrology.
This page is generated from the same findings.json the app ships. Nothing is edited by hand.
If a planet's sign at birth shaped a life, then across hundreds of accomplished people some signs should appear far more often than chance for the planet that "rules" their field. That is a claim you can actually check. So we checked it.
| Planet | n | χ² | p | FDR | strongest sign | survives? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| … | ||||||
The eye-catching raw numbers — "Saturn in Virgo appears 37% more than expected!" — are exactly the mirage the correction removes. Against an era-matched baseline, across a proper multiple-testing correction, no planetary sign placement holds up. The lifts collapse. That is not a bug in the test; it is the test working.
This is the honest result, and it is why SkyLoka refuses to tell you the stars will make you rich, sick, married or sued. Our own evidence says the placement doesn't predict the outcome. What we will do instead is show you the real sky, name the tradition without pretending it's physics, and let you find the documented people who genuinely share your placements.
An app that had run this test and found nothing would have every incentive to bury it. Publishing it is the whole point.